| Title |
Confidence matching in group decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-017-0117 |
| Authors |
Dan Bang, Laurence Aitchison, Rani Moran, Santiago Herce Castanon, Banafsheh Rafiee, Ali Mahmoodi, Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Peter E. Latham, Bahador Bahrami, Christopher Summerfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 16% |
| Denmark | 8 | 8% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 50% |
| Scientists | 45 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#263,224
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#410
of 1,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,366
of 328,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 159.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.