↓ Skip to main content

Nicotine in floral nectar pharmacologically influences bumblebee learning of floral features

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
43 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Nicotine in floral nectar pharmacologically influences bumblebee learning of floral features
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-01980-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Baracchi, A. Marples, A. J. Jenkins, A. R. Leitch, L. Chittka

Abstract

Many plants defend themselves against herbivores by chemical deterrents in their tissues and the presence of such substances in floral nectar means that pollinators often encounter them when foraging. The effect of such substances on the foraging behaviour of pollinators is poorly understood. Using artificial flowers in tightly-controlled laboratory settings, we examined the effects of the alkaloid nicotine on bumblebee foraging performance. We found that bumblebees confronted simultaneously with two equally rewarded nicotine-containing and nicotine-free flower types are deterred only by unnaturally high nicotine concentrations. This deterrence disappears or even turns into attraction at lower nectar-relevant concentrations. The alkaloid has profound effects on learning in a dose-dependent manner. At a high natural dose, bees learn the colour of a nicotine-containing flower type more swiftly than a flower type with the same caloric value but without nicotine. Furthermore, after experiencing flowers containing nicotine in any tested concentration, increasing numbers of bumblebees stay more faithful to these flowers, even if they become a suboptimal choice in terms of reward. These results demonstrate that alkaloids enhance pollinator flower constancy, opening new perspectives in co-evolutionary process between plants and pollinators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 51%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#236,392
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,751
of 138,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,853
of 316,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#78
of 3,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.