↓ Skip to main content

Engineered probiotic Escherichia coli can eliminate and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa gut infection in animal models

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
602 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Engineered probiotic Escherichia coli can eliminate and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa gut infection in animal models
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15028
Pubmed ID
Authors

In Young Hwang, Elvin Koh, Adison Wong, John C. March, William E. Bentley, Yung Seng Lee, Matthew Wook Chang

Abstract

Bacteria can be genetically engineered to kill specific pathogens or inhibit their virulence. We previously developed a synthetic genetic system that allows a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli to sense and kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Here, we generate a modified version of the system, including a gene encoding an anti-biofilm enzyme, and use the probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 as host. The engineered probiotic shows in vivo prophylactic and therapeutic activity against P. aeruginosa during gut infection in two animal models (Caenorhabditis elegans and mice). These findings support the further development of engineered microorganisms with potential prophylactic and therapeutic activities against gut infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 595 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 18%
Student > Master 82 14%
Student > Bachelor 81 13%
Researcher 73 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 72 12%
Unknown 152 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 162 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 42 7%
Engineering 33 5%
Chemical Engineering 25 4%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 171 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#420,942
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,907
of 58,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,809
of 325,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#177
of 902 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 902 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.