↓ Skip to main content

Development of DNA aptamers using Cell-SELEX

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
704 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
940 Mendeley
Title
Development of DNA aptamers using Cell-SELEX
Published in
Nature Protocols, June 2010
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2010.66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwame Sefah, Dihua Shangguan, Xiangling Xiong, Meghan B O'Donoghue, Weihong Tan

Abstract

In the past two decades, high-affinity nucleic acid aptamers have been developed for a wide variety of pure molecules and complex systems such as live cells. Conceptually, aptamers are developed by an evolutionary process, whereby, as selection progresses, sequences with a certain conformation capable of binding to the target of interest emerge and dominate the pool. This protocol, cell-SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment), is a method that can generate DNA aptamers that can bind specifically to a cell type of interest. Commonly, a cancer cell line is used as the target to generate aptamers that can differentiate that cell type from other cancers or normal cells. A single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library pool is incubated with the target cells. Nonbinding sequences are washed off and bound sequences are recovered from the cells by heating cell-DNA complexes at 95 degrees C, followed by centrifugation. The recovered pool is incubated with the control cell line to filter out the sequences that bind to common molecules on both the target and the control, leading to the enrichment of specific binders to the target. Binding sequences are amplified by PCR using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled sense and biotin-labeled antisense primers. This is followed by removal of antisense strands to generate an ssDNA pool for subsequent rounds of selection. The enrichment of the selected pools is monitored by flow cytometry binding assays, with selected pools having increased fluorescence compared with the unselected DNA library. The procedure, from design of oligonucleotides to enrichment of the selected pools, takes approximately 3 months.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 940 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 907 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 234 25%
Researcher 155 16%
Student > Master 115 12%
Student > Bachelor 96 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 5%
Other 117 12%
Unknown 175 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 199 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 190 20%
Chemistry 131 14%
Engineering 73 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 3%
Other 112 12%
Unknown 209 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,390,474
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#453
of 2,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,554
of 96,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.