↓ Skip to main content

Resonant Transparency and Non-Trivial Non-Radiating Excitations in Toroidal Metamaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Resonant Transparency and Non-Trivial Non-Radiating Excitations in Toroidal Metamaterials
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02967
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. A. Fedotov, A. V. Rogacheva, V. Savinov, D. P. Tsai, N. I. Zheludev

Abstract

Engaging strongly resonant interactions allows dramatic enhancement of functionalities of many electromagnetic devices. However, resonances can be dampened by Joule and radiation losses. While in many cases Joule losses may be minimized by the choice of constituting materials, controlling radiation losses is often a bigger problem. Recent solutions include the use of coupled radiant and sub-radiant modes yielding narrow asymmetric Fano resonances in a wide range of systems, from defect states in photonic crystals and optical waveguides with mesoscopic ring resonators to nanoscale plasmonic and metamaterial systems exhibiting interference effects akin to electromagnetically-induced transparency. Here we demonstrate theoretically and confirm experimentally a new mechanism of resonant electromagnetic transparency, which yields very narrow isolated symmetric Lorentzian transmission lines in toroidal metamaterials. It exploits the long sought non-trivial non-radiating charge-current excitation based on interfering electric and toroidal dipoles that was first proposed by Afanasiev and Stepanovsky in [J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 28, 4565 (1995)].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 2%
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 51 39%
Engineering 21 16%
Unspecified 3 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,752,113
of 24,865,967 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#52,723
of 136,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,096
of 218,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#239
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,865,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.