| Title |
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature21708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Gill, Michael B. Mascia, Gabby N. Ahmadia, Louise Glew, Sarah E. Lester, Megan Barnes, Ian Craigie, Emily S. Darling, Christopher M. Free, Jonas Geldmann, Susie Holst, Olaf P. Jensen, Alan T. White, Xavier Basurto, Lauren Coad, Ruth D. Gates, Greg Guannel, Peter J. Mumby, Hannah Thomas, Sarah Whitmee, Stephen Woodley, Helen E. Fox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 687 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 131 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 109 | 16% |
| Canada | 37 | 5% |
| Australia | 32 | 5% |
| Germany | 14 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 88 | 13% |
| Unknown | 251 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 422 | 61% |
| Scientists | 236 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 199 | 16% |
| Researcher | 196 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 179 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 139 | 11% |
| Other | 66 | 5% |
| Other | 144 | 12% |
| Unknown | 292 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 378 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 285 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 2% |
| Other | 89 | 7% |
| Unknown | 348 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 774. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#25,572
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,423
of 98,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#475
of 324,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#49
of 882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.