| Title |
Gene delivery: Suddenly squeezed and shocked
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biomedical Engineering, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41551-017-0047 |
| Authors |
Mehmet Toner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 38% |
| South Africa | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,782,658
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#859
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,154
of 314,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.