| Title |
Autism genetics: opportunities and challenges for clinical translation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrg.2017.4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob A. S. Vorstman, Jeremy R. Parr, Daniel Moreno-De-Luca, Richard J. L. Anney, John I. Nurnberger Jr, Joachim F. Hallmayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Ireland | 5 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 58% |
| Scientists | 41 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 674 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 669 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 105 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 6% |
| Other | 110 | 16% |
| Unknown | 180 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 112 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 90 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 10% |
| Psychology | 45 | 7% |
| Other | 75 | 11% |
| Unknown | 200 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#426,262
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#217
of 2,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,949
of 325,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.