↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity: Complementary canopies

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity: Complementary canopies
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernhard Schmid, Pascal A. Niklaus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,601,071
of 15,654,544 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,099
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,797
of 261,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#82
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,654,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 148.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.