The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Regionally enriched rare deleterious exonic variants in the UK and Ireland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, October 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-024-51604-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mihail Halachev, Viktoria-Eleni Gountouna, Alison Meynert, Gannie Tzoneva, Alan R. Shuldiner, Colin A. Semple, James F. Wilson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,549,694
of 26,742,223 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,973
of 63,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,740
of 145,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#285
of 1,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,742,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.