The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Control of feeding by a bottom-up midbrain-subthalamic pathway
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-024-46430-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fernando M. C. V. Reis, Sandra Maesta-Pereira, Matthias Ollivier, Peter J. Schuette, Ekayana Sethi, Blake A. Miranda, Emily Iniguez, Meghmik Chakerian, Eric Vaughn, Megha Sehgal, Darren C. T. Nguyen, Faith T. H. Yuan, Anita Torossian, Juliane M. Ikebara, Alexandre H. Kihara, Alcino J. Silva, Jonathan C. Kao, Baljit S. Khakh, Avishek Adhikari |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 11% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 27 | 49% |
Members of the public | 25 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#130,309
of 26,441,283 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,904
of 61,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,962
of 356,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#58
of 2,554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,441,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.