| Title |
Cost-effectiveness uncertainty may bias the decision of coal power transitions in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-024-46549-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xizhe Yan, Dan Tong, Yixuan Zheng, Yang Liu, Shaoqing Chen, Xinying Qin, Chuchu Chen, Ruochong Xu, Jing Cheng, Qinren Shi, Dongsheng Zheng, Kebin He, Qiang Zhang, Yu Lei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,301,367
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#47,717
of 57,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,930
of 207,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,153
of 1,668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.