↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic analysis of Mesolithic chewed pitch reveals poor oral health among stone age individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
119 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
66 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Metagenomic analysis of Mesolithic chewed pitch reveals poor oral health among stone age individuals
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-48762-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emrah Kırdök, Natalija Kashuba, Hege Damlien, Mikael A. Manninen, Bengt Nordqvist, Anna Kjellström, Mattias Jakobsson, A. Michael Lindberg, Jan Storå, Per Persson, Björn Andersson, Andrés Aravena, Anders Götherström

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 978. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,406
of 26,107,266 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#280
of 144,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362
of 366,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#9
of 3,542 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,542 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.