| Title |
Metagenomic analysis of Mesolithic chewed pitch reveals poor oral health among stone age individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-023-48762-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emrah Kırdök, Natalija Kashuba, Hege Damlien, Mikael A. Manninen, Bengt Nordqvist, Anna Kjellström, Mattias Jakobsson, A. Michael Lindberg, Jan Storå, Per Persson, Björn Andersson, Andrés Aravena, Anders Götherström |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 82% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 979. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,175
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#277
of 143,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 356,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#9
of 3,523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.