Title |
Magnesium–ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41591-023-02705-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsten N. Cherian, Jackob N. Keynan, Lauren Anker, Afik Faerman, Randi E. Brown, Ahmed Shamma, Or Keynan, John P. Coetzee, Jean-Marie Batail, Angela Phillips, Nicholas J. Bassano, Gregory L. Sahlem, Jose Inzunza, Trevor Millar, Jonathan Dickinson, C. E. Rolle, Jennifer Keller, Maheen Adamson, Ian H. Kratter, Nolan R. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 258 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 76 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 13 | 5% |
Canada | 9 | 3% |
Brazil | 6 | 2% |
Turkey | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 123 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 186 | 72% |
Scientists | 40 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 15% |
Psychology | 5 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 822. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,116
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#182
of 9,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#436
of 357,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#9
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.