| Title |
High-fidelity mass analysis unveils heterogeneity in intact ribosomal particles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michiel van de Waterbeemd, Kyle L Fort, Dmitriy Boll, Maria Reinhardt-Szyba, Andrew Routh, Alexander Makarov, Albert J R Heck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 24% |
| Researcher | 48 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 59 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 59 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,811,585
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,061
of 5,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,453
of 425,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#45
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.