The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jasmine R. Nelson-Olivieri, Tamara J. Layden, Edder Antunez, Ali Khalighifar, Monica Lasky, Theresa M. Laverty, Karina A. Sanchez, Graeme Shannon, Steven Starr, Anahita K. Verahrami, Sara P. Bombaci |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 48% |
Scientists | 29 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 380. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#87,017
of 26,518,120 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#220
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,451
of 395,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,518,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 153.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.