| Title |
Pollen and spores as biological recorders of past ultraviolet irradiance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep39269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillip E. Jardine, Wesley T. Fraser, Barry H. Lomax, Mark A. Sephton, Timothy M. Shanahan, Charlotte S. Miller, William D. Gosling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 34% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 74% |
| Scientists | 8 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#860,015
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,148
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,443
of 428,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#247
of 3,600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.