| Title |
Effects of delayed cord clamping on residual placental blood volume, hemoglobin and bilirubin levels in term infants: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Perinatology, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/jp.2016.222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J S Mercer, D A Erickson-Owens, J Collins, M O Barcelos, A B Parker, J F Padbury |
| Abstract |
The objective of the study was to measure the effects of a 5-min delay (DCC) versus immediate cord clamping (ICC) on residual placental blood volume (RPBV) at birth, and hemoglobin and serum bilirubin at 24 to 48 h of age. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 73 women with term (37 to 41 weeks) singleton fetuses were randomized to DCC (⩾5 min; n=37) or ICC (<20 s; n=36). Maternal and infant demographics were not different between the groups. Mean cord clamping time was 303±121 (DCC) versus 23±59 (ICC) s (P<0.001) with 10 protocol violations. Cord milking was the proxy for DCC (n=11) when the provider could not wait. Infants randomized to DCC compared with ICC had significantly less RPBV (20.0 versus 30.8 ml kg(-1), P<0.001), higher hemoglobin levels (19.4 versus 17.8 g dl(-1), P=0.002) at 24 to 48 h, with no difference in bilirubin levels. Term infants had early hematological advantage of DCC without increases in hyperbilirubinemia or symptomatic polycythemia.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 8 December 2016; doi:10.1038/jp.2016.222. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 33% |
| Canada | 5 | 24% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#874,468
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#68
of 2,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,839
of 420,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.