↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin C Requirements of the Syrian Hamster

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 1943
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions
Title
Vitamin C Requirements of the Syrian Hamster
Published in
Nature, September 1943
DOI 10.1038/152300b0
Authors

DONALD F. CLAUSEN, WILLIAM G. CLARK

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,122,220
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#69,369
of 96,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.