| Title |
Uracil in the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-36904-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Oba, Toshiki Koga, Yoshinori Takano, Nanako O. Ogawa, Naohiko Ohkouchi, Kazunori Sasaki, Hajime Sato, Daniel P. Glavin, Jason P. Dworkin, Hiroshi Naraoka, Shogo Tachibana, Hisayoshi Yurimoto, Tomoki Nakamura, Takaaki Noguchi, Ryuji Okazaki, Hikaru Yabuta, Kanako Sakamoto, Toru Yada, Masahiro Nishimura, Aiko Nakato, Akiko Miyazaki, Kasumi Yogata, Masanao Abe, Tatsuaki Okada, Tomohiro Usui, Makoto Yoshikawa, Takanao Saiki, Satoshi Tanaka, Fuyuto Terui, Satoru Nakazawa, Sei-ichiro Watanabe, Yuichi Tsuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 599 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74 | 12% |
| Japan | 39 | 7% |
| Spain | 35 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| France | 13 | 2% |
| Chile | 12 | 2% |
| India | 9 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 87 | 15% |
| Unknown | 300 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 463 | 77% |
| Scientists | 113 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,965
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#72
of 58,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104
of 424,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#4
of 1,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.