Title |
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41591-022-02158-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline E. Dale, Rohan Takhar, Raymond Carragher, Michail Katsoulis, Fatemeh Torabi, Stephen Duffield, Seamus Kent, Tanja Mueller, Amanj Kurdi, Thu Nguyen Le Anh, Stuart McTaggart, Hoda Abbasizanjani, Sam Hollings, Andrew Scourfield, Ronan A. Lyons, Rowena Griffiths, Jane Lyons, Gareth Davies, Daniel Harris, Alex Handy, Mehrdad A. Mizani, Christopher Tomlinson, Johan H. Thygesen, Mark Ashworth, Spiros Denaxas, Amitava Banerjee, Jonathan A. C. Sterne, Paul Brown, Ian Bullard, Rouven Priedon, Mamas A. Mamas, Ann Slee, Paula Lorgelly, Munir Pirmohamed, Kamlesh Khunti, Andrew D. Morris, Cathie Sudlow, Ashley Akbari, Marion Bennie, Naveed Sattar, Reecha Sofat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
Finland | 2 | 4% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 34 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 53% |
Scientists | 16 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 43 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 44 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 406. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#76,261
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#442
of 9,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,996
of 485,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#13
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.