| Title |
Gene promoters show chromosome-specificity and reveal chromosome territories in humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Gagniuc, Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste |
| Abstract |
Gene promoters have guided evolution processes for millions of years. It seems that they were the main engine responsible for the integration of different mutations favorable for the environmental conditions. In cooperation with different transcription factors and other biochemical components, these regulatory regions dictate the synthesis frequency of RNA molecules. Predominantly in the last decade, it has become clear that nuclear organization impacts upon gene regulation. To fully understand the connections between Homo sapiens chromosomes and their gene promoters, we analyzed 1200 promoter sequences using our Kappa Index of Coincidence method. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 98% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 63 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#832,960
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#101
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,926
of 205,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#3
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.