| Title |
Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2840 |
| Authors |
Fengming Xi, Steven J. Davis, Philippe Ciais, Douglas Crawford-Brown, Dabo Guan, Claus Pade, Tiemao Shi, Mark Syddall, Jie Lv, Lanzhu Ji, Longfei Bing, Jiaoyue Wang, Wei Wei, Keun-Hyeok Yang, Björn Lagerblad, Isabel Galan, Carmen Andrade, Ying Zhang, Zhu Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 14% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 4% |
| France | 9 | 4% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 4 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 82 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 136 | 67% |
| Scientists | 53 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 741 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 733 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 19% |
| Researcher | 106 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 6% |
| Professor | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 124 | 17% |
| Unknown | 213 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 190 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 78 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 39 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 114 | 15% |
| Unknown | 257 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 493. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#54,036
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#144
of 3,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,104
of 417,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.