The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,211 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Diana Romero, Christopher J. Kopka, Salim Abdool Karim, Laith J. Abu-Raddad, Gisele Almeida, Ricardo Baptista-Leite, Joshua A. Barocas, Mauricio L. Barreto, Yaneer Bar-Yam, Quique Bassat, Carolina Batista, Morgan Bazilian, Shu-Ti Chiou, Carlos del Rio, Gregory J. Dore, George F. Gao, Lawrence O. Gostin, Margaret Hellard, Jose L. Jimenez, Gagandeep Kang, Nancy Lee, Mojca Matičič, Martin McKee, Sabin Nsanzimana, Miquel Oliu-Barton, Bary Pradelski, Oksana Pyzik, Kenneth Rabin, Sunil Raina, Sabina Faiz Rashid, Magdalena Rathe, Rocio Saenz, Sudhvir Singh, Malene Trock-Hempler, Sonia Villapol, Peiling Yap, Agnes Binagwaho, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Ayman El-Mohandes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 701 | 6% |
| Canada | 402 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 247 | 2% |
| Australia | 148 | 1% |
| Spain | 94 | <1% |
| France | 87 | <1% |
| Germany | 77 | <1% |
| Mexico | 68 | <1% |
| Finland | 43 | <1% |
| Other | 606 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8738 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9454 | 84% |
| Scientists | 924 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 567 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 241 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 116 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#549
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#41
of 100,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 446,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.