↓ Skip to main content

Tracking the decoy: maximizing the decoy effect through sequential experimentation

Overview of attention for article published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Tracking the decoy: maximizing the decoy effect through sequential experimentation
Published in
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, November 2016
DOI 10.1057/palcomms.2016.82
Authors

Maurits C Kaptein, Robin Van Emden, Davide Iannuzzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Professor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 22 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 12%
Psychology 7 12%
Computer Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 27 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,673,086
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#1,302
of 2,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,196
of 313,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.