| Title |
Evaluation of the concentration of point defects in GaN
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-08570-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. A. Reshchikov, A. Usikov, H. Helava, Yu. Makarov, V. Prozheeva, I. Makkonen, F. Tuomisto, J. H. Leach, K. Udwary |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 14 | 26% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 21% |
| Engineering | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#38,875
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,021
of 328,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,541
of 5,913 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,913 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.