Title |
A viral strategy for targeting and manipulating interneurons across vertebrate species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/nn.4430 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jordane Dimidschstein, Qian Chen, Robin Tremblay, Stephanie L Rogers, Giuseppe-Antonio Saldi, Lihua Guo, Qing Xu, Runpeng Liu, Congyi Lu, Jianhua Chu, Joshua S Grimley, Anne-Rachel Krostag, Ajamete Kaykas, Michael C Avery, Mohammad S Rashid, Myungin Baek, Amanda L Jacob, Gordon B Smith, Daniel E Wilson, Georg Kosche, Illya Kruglikov, Tomasz Rusielewicz, Vibhakar C Kotak, Todd M Mowery, Stewart A Anderson, Edward M Callaway, Jeremy S Dasen, David Fitzpatrick, Valentina Fossati, Michael A Long, Scott Noggle, John H Reynolds, Dan H Sanes, Bernardo Rudy, Guoping Feng, Gord Fishell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 54% |
Germany | 2 | 5% |
Japan | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 59% |
Scientists | 16 | 39% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 904 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 225 | 25% |
Researcher | 192 | 21% |
Student > Master | 83 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 63 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 6% |
Other | 137 | 15% |
Unknown | 161 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 397 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 186 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 3% |
Engineering | 14 | 2% |
Other | 60 | 7% |
Unknown | 189 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#986,004
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,613
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,174
of 322,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#32
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.