| Title |
Patterns of social mixing in England changed in line with restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to April 2022)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-022-14431-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise E. Smith, Henry W. W. Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T. Fear, Susan Michie, G. James Rubin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 60% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#695,870
of 24,933,778 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,565
of 136,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,053
of 434,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#199
of 4,339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,933,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.