↓ Skip to main content

CPEB1 coordinates alternative 3′-UTR formation with translational regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
CPEB1 coordinates alternative 3′-UTR formation with translational regulation
Published in
Nature, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature11901
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felice-Alessio Bava, Carolina Eliscovich, Pedro G. Ferreira, Belen Miñana, Claudia Ben-Dov, Roderic Guigó, Juan Valcárcel, Raúl Méndez

Abstract

More than half of mammalian genes generate multiple messenger RNA isoforms that differ in their 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs) and therefore in regulatory sequences, often associated with cell proliferation and cancer; however, the mechanisms coordinating alternative 3'-UTR processing for specific mRNA populations remain poorly defined. Here we report that the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 1 (CPEB1), an RNA-binding protein that regulates mRNA translation, also controls alternative 3'-UTR processing. CPEB1 shuttles to the nucleus, where it co-localizes with splicing factors and mediates shortening of hundreds of mRNA 3' UTRs, thereby modulating their translation efficiency in the cytoplasm. CPEB1-mediated 3'-UTR shortening correlates with cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. CPEB1 binding to pre-mRNAs not only directs the use of alternative polyadenylation sites, but also changes alternative splicing by preventing U2AF65 recruitment. Our results reveal a novel function of CPEB1 in mediating alternative 3'-UTR processing, which is coordinated with regulation of mRNA translation, through its dual nuclear and cytoplasmic functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 267 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 30%
Researcher 60 21%
Student > Master 28 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 26 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 23%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 32 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#1,571,206
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,959
of 97,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,886
of 205,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#558
of 984 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 984 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.