| Title |
Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41576-022-00455-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiyu Wan, James W. Hazel, Ellen Wright Clayton, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bradley A. Malin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 58% |
| Scientists | 26 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#398,481
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#199
of 2,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,104
of 451,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.