↓ Skip to main content

Learning to 'think systems'

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

1 news outlet
11 tweeters


2 Dimensions

Readers on

23 Mendeley
Learning to 'think systems'
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/nnano.2016.161
Pubmed ID

Rein V. Ulijn, Elisa Riedo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 17%
Chemistry 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
of 16,214,254 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 267,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,214,254 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.