↓ Skip to main content

Value-based pricing of drugs with multiple indications or in combinations — lessons from Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Value-based pricing of drugs with multiple indications or in combinations — lessons from Europe
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, September 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41571-021-00561-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin N. Vokinger, Aaron S. Kesselheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,396,352
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#555
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,747
of 432,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.