| Title |
Virus-induced senescence is a driver and therapeutic target in COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03995-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soyoung Lee, Yong Yu, Jakob Trimpert, Fahad Benthani, Mario Mairhofer, Paulina Richter-Pechanska, Emanuel Wyler, Dimitri Belenki, Sabine Kaltenbrunner, Maria Pammer, Lea Kausche, Theresa C. Firsching, Kristina Dietert, Michael Schotsaert, Carles Martínez-Romero, Gagandeep Singh, Séverine Kunz, Daniela Niemeyer, Riad Ghanem, Helmut J. F. Salzer, Christian Paar, Michael Mülleder, Melissa Uccellini, Edward G. Michaelis, Amjad Khan, Andrea Lau, Martin Schönlein, Anna Habringer, Josef Tomasits, Julia M. Adler, Susanne Kimeswenger, Achim D. Gruber, Wolfram Hoetzenecker, Herta Steinkellner, Bettina Purfürst, Reinhard Motz, Francesco Di Pierro, Bernd Lamprecht, Nikolaus Osterrieder, Markus Landthaler, Christian Drosten, Adolfo García-Sastre, Rupert Langer, Markus Ralser, Roland Eils, Maurice Reimann, Dorothy N. Y. Fan, Clemens A. Schmitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 662 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 11% |
| Japan | 61 | 9% |
| Germany | 31 | 5% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| Spain | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Austria | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 52 | 8% |
| Unknown | 386 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 559 | 84% |
| Scientists | 69 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 70 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,882
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,666
of 98,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 436,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#114
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.