↓ Skip to main content

Molecular analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Molecular analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-95034-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dariusz Jarych, Ewa Augustynowicz-Kopec, Agnieszka Iwanska, Pawel Parniewski, Marta Majchrzak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,011,280
of 19,233,288 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#86,624
of 103,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,446
of 334,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,233,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.