RT @lonnibesancon: @MaxDelvallee @CeliaEryth @MartinKulldorff @DrJBhattacharya Bravo Max pour la double erreur. D'abord le sophisme de l'a…
RT @lonnibesancon: @MaxDelvallee @CeliaEryth @MartinKulldorff @DrJBhattacharya Bravo Max pour la double erreur. D'abord le sophisme de l'a…
@MaxDelvallee @CeliaEryth @MartinKulldorff @DrJBhattacharya Bravo Max pour la double erreur. D'abord le sophisme de l'argument d'autorité pour Kulldorff et Bhattacharya (qui au passage sont tout sauf parmi les meilleurs). Ensuite, le shielding (c'est le n
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations https://t.co/KLZ28WepSu
RT @ScienceShared: Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations https://t.co/yeqLNhcMBs https://t.co/HQIRt6…
À ajouter enfin que la protection des personnes fragiles, dont la Great Barrington Declaration et beaucoup de gens proches de Marseille adorent faire la promotion, est inefficace. 14/n https://t.co/TYvyheJkch
RT @ScienceShared: @michaeljswalker https://t.co/kxd4zsLCeV Also worth considering how successful shielding was as a strategy in previous…
@michaeljswalker https://t.co/kxd4zsLCeV Also worth considering how successful shielding was as a strategy in previous waves in UK (when prevalence got to nowhere near what modelling suggests it may well get to with Omicron) : https://t.co/yeqLNhcMBs
RT @DecodingTrolls: @MarionKoopmans Zeus ⚡️ to humanity: It's on you... "We find little evidence of meteorological con- ditions having infl…
@MarionKoopmans Zeus ⚡️ to humanity: It's on you... "We find little evidence of meteorological con- ditions having influenced the early stages of local epidemics and conclude that population behaviour & government interventions are more important drive
RT @DecodingTrolls: @Orla_Hegarty This is how things went in the UK: https://t.co/14gG3ZmvC3 Mass Infection policy concealed by euphemism:…
RT @DecodingTrolls: @Orla_Hegarty This is how things went in the UK: https://t.co/14gG3ZmvC3 Mass Infection policy concealed by euphemism:…
@Orla_Hegarty This is how things went in the UK: https://t.co/14gG3ZmvC3 Mass Infection policy concealed by euphemism: Herd Immunity; Protect The 'Vulnerable' (oops! More shielders died than would have otherwise: Nature journal - (https://t.co/UCb89FMid8).
@YouAreLobbyLud From 02/20 "vulnerability" unthinkingly deployed to divide the herd from applicat. of the universality of human rights - a core aim of Herd Immunity'ites & Social Dominators (https://t.co/F9PUm9soFO). "Shielding," which increased risk o
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
RT @abirballan: Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old…
Shielding or no shielding made no difference. 1) Go back to the root causes and improve your health 2) Accept death in old age. It's part of life. "In conclusion, in spite of the shielding strategy, high-risk individuals were at increased risk of death."
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
Surrender to the #WuhanVirus. #ResistanceIsFutile
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
RT @TheAntiPCProf: Lockdowns and masking do NOTHING to mitigate the spread of covid or to reduce the mortality rate. Rather, the risk of mo…
@peterlepoutre @FrankDierickx @Tim_Joye @Sofie_Merckx Jij bent degene die zo panisch van angst is dat je miljoenen permanent wil opsluiten (wat niet werkt, zie link), kinderen en ouderen wil opofferen en honderdduizenden wil doden. In plaats van een simpe
@rikaans14 @_mizmo @Ketamine38 @Didier_Bmnt 2. Vaccinez les "fragiles" ça ne fonctionne pas et c'est pas suffisant car tout le monde peut finir en réa. Tu prouves ton ignorance à chaque tweet. C'est comme la stratégie de confiner les fragiles. Un échec cf
RT @lonnibesancon: Where on earth is that empirical evidence @MartinKulldorff ? You've been wrong on everything so far COVID-wise. Also, he…
Where on earth is that empirical evidence @MartinKulldorff ? You've been wrong on everything so far COVID-wise. Also, here is some evidence that the strategy you and your GBD folks love, shielding, does not work. https://t.co/TYvyhf0V3P
COVID-19:長期間の自己隔離は期待されているほど有効でないかもしれない | Scientific Reports | Nature Portfolio: https://t.co/JttGKrXXxb
RT @renissance_1: Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations | Scientific Reports https://t.co/MQN63br8hs
Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations | Scientific Reports https://t.co/MQN63br8hs
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @MicheleMido: Merci de traduire l’article pour que l on se rende compte de son importance
Interessant draadje met studie dat 'zelf-isolatie, eventueel enkel de hoog risicogroep, niet werkt én zeker een lockdown niet kan vervangen.
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
Merci de traduire l’article pour que l on se rende compte de son importance
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @uumulmahaye: Il ne sert à rien d'isoler les plus fragiles pour les protéger, ça ne fonctionne pas. Vaccinez-vous 🙏 https://t.co/VXUYUHi…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @FZores: Isoler seulement les personnes à risque de formes graves et les laisser les autres vivre leur vie ne semble pas marcher Pas tr…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
Il ne sert à rien d'isoler les plus fragiles pour les protéger, ça ne fonctionne pas. Vaccinez-vous 🙏
RT @zanfr: #COVID19 protéger uniquement les "personnes à risque" ne fonctionne pas. Par contre les confinements oui. https://t.co/ThtT0XJyhn
RT @FZores: Isoler seulement les personnes à risque de formes graves et les laisser les autres vivre leur vie ne semble pas marcher Pas tr…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @zanfr: #COVID19 protéger uniquement les "personnes à risque" ne fonctionne pas. Par contre les confinements oui. https://t.co/ThtT0XJyhn
RT @Joseph_Browning: Unsurprisingly, "shielding the vulnerable" doesn't work very well as a non-pharmaceutical intervention. https://t.co/I…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
Unsurprisingly, "shielding the vulnerable" doesn't work very well as a non-pharmaceutical intervention.
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…
RT @lonnibesancon: A new paper out in @Nature Scientific Reports examining if shielding strategies (of at-risk individual) works for #COVID…