| Title |
Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-94630-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bhautesh D. Jani, Frederick K. Ho, David J. Lowe, Jamie P. Traynor, Sean P. MacBride-Stewart, Patrick B. Mark, Frances S. Mair, Jill P. Pell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 13% |
| United States | 22 | 11% |
| France | 10 | 5% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Israel | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 113 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 78% |
| Scientists | 26 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 915. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#19,069
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#302
of 142,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#779
of 443,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#10
of 3,915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.