↓ Skip to main content

Inconsistent prediction capability of ImmuneCells.Sig across different RNA-seq datasets

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Inconsistent prediction capability of ImmuneCells.Sig across different RNA-seq datasets
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24303-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Xiao, Canqiang Xu, Wenxian Yang, Rongshan Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 29%
Computer Science 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Other 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#16,892,769
of 19,097,846 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#36,465
of 37,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,945
of 332,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,097,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them