| Title |
The vicious and virtuous circles of clonal hematopoiesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-021-01396-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nili Furer, Nathali Kaushansky, Liran I. Shlush |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 21% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,071,459
of 25,225,182 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#4,544
of 9,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,051
of 439,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#99
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.