| Title |
Transforming Antarctic management and policy with an Indigenous Māori lens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-021-01466-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priscilla M. Wehi, Vincent van Uitregt, Nigel J. Scott, Tasman Gillies, Jacinta Beckwith, Rata Pryor Rodgers, Krushil Watene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 20 | 20% |
| Australia | 11 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 64% |
| Scientists | 26 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#234,079
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#442
of 2,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,785
of 460,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.