The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,460 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Impact of daily high dose oral vitamin D therapy on the inflammatory markers in patients with COVID 19 disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-90189-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maheshwar Lakkireddy, Srikanth Goud Gadiga, R. D. Malathi, Madhu Latha Karra, I. S. S. V. Prasad Murthy Raju, Ragini, Sangeetha Chinapaka, K. S. S. Sai Baba, Manohar Kandakatla |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 280 | 11% |
| Japan | 60 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 59 | 2% |
| Canada | 54 | 2% |
| Turkey | 43 | 2% |
| France | 39 | 2% |
| India | 36 | 1% |
| Italy | 34 | 1% |
| Germany | 19 | <1% |
| Other | 181 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1655 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2304 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 87 | 4% |
| Scientists | 47 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Researcher | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 125 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1694. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,742
of 26,434,713 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#105
of 148,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312
of 463,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#5
of 4,546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,434,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.