@Cutefuzzyweasel @Mrbankstips @latestinspace https://t.co/bXtFBk1Zcw "Fragmentation events are not confined to their local orbits" https://t.co/TrXDnWJeci
RT @JohnBarentine: There's also the separate (but related) matter of what happens to all that stuff that rockets spew into the atmosphere o…
There's also the separate (but related) matter of what happens to all that stuff that rockets spew into the atmosphere on their way up, and material shed during re-entry when satellites come back down. (see, e.g., https://t.co/KbNrAW1Qij)
RT @brianweeden: 13/ There are other other sustainability challenges, such as light pollution (https://t.co/3piicQ0Mi4) and atmospheric pol…
RT @brianweeden: 13/ There are other other sustainability challenges, such as light pollution (https://t.co/3piicQ0Mi4) and atmospheric pol…
13/ There are other other sustainability challenges, such as light pollution (https://t.co/3piicQ0Mi4) and atmospheric pollution from re-entry (https://t.co/yDyB5zVHnb) that still pose challenges or are not well understood
Burning aluminum satellites in the atmosphere will likely have a similar effect as geoengineering,..https://t.co/snazT9K7Lz.
#385tech The private sector's space race for mega-constellations could cause satellite collisions and impede astronomy; private-sector deployment has accelerated rapidly in recent years. How can we curb this impeding disaster? https://t.co/OMigL6RUQh
@torybruno Interesting, thanks😉- treaties agreed before, rather than after entangled sovereignty claims result in a tragedy of the commons would be ideal. Competing interests (ie astronomy) would have differing views on a foreseeable limit to the real est
(6/7) Mandating controlled reentries into remote areas of the ocean is currently the best way to reduce casualty risks. Complete atmospheric demise may also be possible for some rocket bodies. However, this doesn’t address all environmental risks. https://
@twit_grim @GeorgeMonbiot None of these systems talk to each other and thanks to lack of regulation - they could collide with each other, risking lots. Here’s a good article if interested. https://t.co/8FEbsMBZBn
@JohnBarentine @USGAO @FCC My concern is FCC adopted new policy for 5yr deorbit WITHOUT Environmental Assessment too. Despite much cheering by space community, this could rapidly increase ozone-depletion if 2021 study by @michael_byers replicated. "Burn-up
@elonmusk @Teslarati @13ericralph31 It just keeps getting worse. Scientists think Starlink burn ups will alter the upper atmosphere and contribute to climate change. https://t.co/4Hi0NcdNfB
@cjnewbs @mikko And yes - we have circa 54 tons of natural meteroids entering atmosphere daily, BUT their rocks are mostly oxygen, magnesium and silicon. https://t.co/XXbZr9AmPO
RT @GreensRgv: Sources: 1. STARLINK technology pollution and debris: https://t.co/SXS4EjfogP
Sources: 1. STARLINK technology pollution and debris: https://t.co/SXS4EjfogP
Starlink is not in geo, but instead LEO, similar to where $ASTS will be. Observers do not have to look out too far to see a quickly escalating problem with LEO real estate and lack of regulatory oversight https://t.co/lcYjyCrm1I https://t.co/qJRtIBb38v
@_TheGeoff The concern is about changing the radiative balance of the atmosphere. Injecting alumina at high (~many 10s of km) has been proposed as a geoengineering method. Here’s another ref I was looking for earlier (specific to reentries). It’s not payw
Otro cuento para no dormir. cc/ @jorgeherber
"Anthropogenic deposition of aluminum in the atmosphere has long been proposed in the context of geoengineering as a way to alter Earth’s albedo... Mega-constellations will begin this process as an uncontrolled experiment" @DrRobBellamy https://t.co/Breb5
RT @herukano: @Robotbeat See I thought the same until an article in nature was pointed out to me . Seems less clear cut to me now https…
@ZachWeiner Optical astronomy has already been negatively impacted by Starlink and radio astronomy is under threat in the near future. The time taken to "fix" all the noise the system introduces to ground-based research is time and money taken from actual
@stillawake A few reputable linkses. :) Annoying astronomy https://t.co/Z5Ek691YfU Bad network security https://t.co/PWEUzYv3mr Pollution because LEO "fall down a lot" (see also launch pollution) https://t.co/jQ7KUDYViz
RT @OuterSpaceInst: "Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" by @michael_byers and Aaro…
🛰 Estudo publicado indica que "mega constelações de satélites criam riscos para a órbita baixa da Terra, para a atmosfera e para o planeta": "Cooperação Internacional é urgentemente necessária, assim como um marco regulatório". 👇
RT @OuterSpaceInst: "Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" by @michael_byers and Aaro…
RT @OuterSpaceInst: "Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" by @michael_byers and Aaro…
Is this the academic equivalent of going viral? Seriously, most of my previous articles have been read by a few dozen people, tops.
RT @OuterSpaceInst: "Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" by @michael_byers and Aaro…
"Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" by @michael_byers and Aaron Boley has received over 26,000 downloads since its publication. Access the article here: https://t.co/ndnzz88TJN
RT @ProfHughLewis: And this is for all the objects we can detect and track. There's a very important and substantial population of lethal n…
RT @ProfHughLewis: And this is for all the objects we can detect and track. There's a very important and substantial population of lethal n…
RT @atmoastro: Recently, 40 of 49 Starlink satellites got affected by increasing atmospheric drag induced by a solar storm reaching us at t…
Recently, 40 of 49 Starlink satellites got affected by increasing atmospheric drag induced by a solar storm reaching us at the time of sat deployment. Those 40 satellites will reenter the Earth's atmosphere. I then thought of the Boley & Byers paper.
@aussiastronomer When I heard of this event, I thought of the Boley & Byers paper.https://t.co/P0w803tzgv
@erasmix You are? #SpaceX #Amazon #Boeing all want mega constellations. It, unfortunately, will happen and then we lose access to space. Too bad they don't wait to figure out how to clean up LEO first. Read the following: https://t.co/sJWfokjDt5
@JohnChinner @Nathan_M_Sci @WesternJ_ @planet4589 @AirbusSpace Ideally by tomorrow, that would be fab. This is the nature paper which discusses that burning aluminium satellites up in the atmosphere might blow a hole in the ozone layer and could change Ear
@NickAstronomer @WorthyHarley These are all interesting points, thanks both. I was hoping to not focus on Kessler Syndrome and talk about other concerns. This is that Nature article, the particular paragraph is after Figure 3, a few paragraphs down https:/
This paper, linked to from the article, is kinda staggering: there are so many hard-to-quantify environmental externalities, from aluminium deposition in the upper atmosphere to the risk of people being killed directly by re-entering satellites! https://t.
(2021/05/20) Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth | Scientific Reports https://t.co/RgZ5BOEHCv
@kalmantibs More alarmingly https://t.co/FWFyxCgQHY
RT @whyvert: "Using simple models, we show that untracked debris will lead to potentially dangerous on-orbit collisions on a regular basis…
"Using simple models, we show that untracked debris will lead to potentially dangerous on-orbit collisions on a regular basis due to the large number of satellites within mega-constellation orbital shells." Source: https://t.co/sPxTm5P6XS https://t.co/20I
@CosmosMagazine @LeoLabs_Space What is the best strategy to stop / slow down the deployment of these massive mega-satellite constellations? https://t.co/5TPkWjPSZT "Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth"
RT @Amor_y_Rabia: INTERNET, ARMA DE DESTRUCCIÓN MASIVA: Las decenas de miles de satélites que Amazon o Elon Musk están poniendo en órbita p…
@Kaynouky C’est exagéré, voici un article plus objectif et très complet, où l’on voit simplement que SpaceX a mis (comme d’hab) un coup de pied aux fesses aux vieilles institutions, mais elles auront le temps d’adapter les régulations, et spaceX collabore
@TerezaPultarova @OuterSpaceInst @richardbranson @JeffBezos You got it right - in a short news report! https://t.co/GFwBSJR6tw
@MWeeksDev @keenethery Also worth looking at: this paper by Aaron Boley about the risks posed by large constellation sizes https://t.co/akkx5epqgu
@marclamonthill Some thoughts: (1) Sounds awesome. Definitely something I’d want. (2) I hope we proactively find solutions to some of the environmental impacts of this tech: https://t.co/NK1tLPKqKq (3) Space has so much potential to make life better on Ear
(IMG) RECORDEMOS: En 2007 China probó con éxito la destrucción de un satélite con un misil, llenando la atmósfera de restos metálicos que pueden dañar la capa de ozono (IZDA restos tras el derribo, DCHA restos un mes después) 1) https://t.co/byAb5jZsje 2)
INTERNET, ARMA DE DESTRUCCIÓN MASIVA: Las decenas de miles de satélites que Amazon o Elon Musk están poniendo en órbita podrían causar un agujero en la capa de ozono que protege la vida en la Tierra 1) https://t.co/EbCHtO1xtb 2) https://t.co/rId3uZk9QA 3)
Here's the clearest discussion I've seen yet about the problem with large constellations: https://t.co/L00Z3oCbGv
RT @hibbes: @dansiela_b @pikarl @riffreporter Nein. Das Paper erwähnt, dass regelmäßige Raketenstarts die Ozonschicht schädigen können, das…
"Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth" https://t.co/Aeurcd6TTg "risks multiple tragedies of the commons, including tragedies to ground-based astronomy, Earth orbit, and Earth’s upper atmosphere" #SpaceX
RT @SciReports: According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerosp…
According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerospaceengineering https://t.co/SHNWmJFdKj
RT @michael_byers: The latest "tragedy of the commons" is low Earth orbit, as Aaron Boley and I explain in our latest article -- published…
Little recognition that Earth’s orbit is a finite resource, space & Earth environments are connected, & actions of one can affect all: “Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth” Pub in @NaturePortfo
@Floramujaasi That is not included yet: https://t.co/16Rm6xwAck
According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerospaceengineering https://t.co/SHNWmJWOBR
@Teslamania5 @justin_swanhart @mhelal2 @robmactwit @TheCryptoLark I can keep on going and put a bunch of links showing you how it will impact every single one of us (and not benefit us all, at all!) with these megaconstellations projects. It's also gonna b
RT @dalcrose: 기사에서 언급된 연구: Boley, A.C., Byers, M. Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Ear…
@Marconi_Fabio @elonmusk @crheller @SpaceX That paper ( https://t.co/rWmr5GcTAM ) is full of errors and unfounded assumptions unfortunately, starting from Starlink's mass (260 kg is its wet mass, not dry), to aluminum content per sat, assuming close to 100
@planet4589 @carlysagan @merrdiff Aaron Boley on this > https://t.co/UqRpZ7siKr
Among other unwanted effects, megaconstellations of satellites may pose risks, such as: increased likelihood of collisions in orbit and atmospheric effects (including the possibility of ozone depletion), as alerted in the study of Boley & Byers. https:
@elonmusk Hello mister Musk. We never met and probably never will, yet I suppose it is still OK to discuss? I recently read this article https://t.co/xOJjElIN5K, and wondered whether you were informed about this, and what your thoughts might be on what loo
@cryptomanran Worst than Tesla cars there are the Starlink satellites, a big danger for the atmosphere. @SpaceX @SpaceXStarlink Look at Nature website : https://t.co/Bb4F9x30y5 @elonmusk concerned about ecology, is-that a joke ???
Risque lors de la désagrégation des satellites. Risk during satellite disaggregation #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency https://t.co/Q5K6H6uBdn
@elonmusk Elon, is this article bs or is it something you are looking into? Thx https://t.co/lJQCGwCBcX
RT @dalcrose: 기사에서 언급된 연구: Boley, A.C., Byers, M. Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Ear…
RT @dalcrose: 기사에서 언급된 연구: Boley, A.C., Byers, M. Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Ear…
RT @SciReports: According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerosp…
기사에서 언급된 연구: Boley, A.C., Byers, M. Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth. Sci Rep 11, 10642 (2021). https://t.co/XrA6vLKL4u
@SafeNotAnOption @Tomas_Stellar @DJSnM The growth of this market will inevitably cause a massive debris LEO pollution issue. Even the single normal operation of Starlink will bring such risk closer to the unacceptable https://t.co/btVZBa1FED
According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerospaceengineering https://t.co/SHNWmJFdKj
According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerospaceengineering https://t.co/SHNWmJFdKj
RT @JustSpaceOrg: Returning to the Starlink aspect, the authors point out that Starlinks deorbiting might end up being an *uncontrolled* ex…
Returning to the Starlink aspect, the authors point out that Starlinks deorbiting might end up being an *uncontrolled* experiment in geoengineering, and that at minimum the potential effects are hard to predict ahead of time #JustSpaceTalk https://t.co/Cdf
RT @anlomedad: Gates, Musk, Bezo vereint im unregulierten Geoengineering. Erwartet werden 2.2t verglühende Satelliten/Tag allein von Starli…
RT @anlomedad: Gates, Musk, Bezo vereint im unregulierten Geoengineering. Erwartet werden 2.2t verglühende Satelliten/Tag allein von Starli…
Gates, Musk, Bezo vereint im unregulierten Geoengineering. Erwartet werden 2.2t verglühende Satelliten/Tag allein von Starlink. Das entstehende Aluminiumoxid verändert das Albedo auf ununtersuchte Art + perforiert auch Ozonschicht.https://t.co/9rOEBjNdlI.
According to this study, satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth #Aerospaceengineering https://t.co/SHNWmJFdKj
LEO Satellites the New Horror to Earthlings #Leo #nearearthorbit #satellite @SpaceX https://t.co/FwLFBtzMAU
RT @larrypress: Defunct #satellites will burn up in the atmosphere - what could possibly go wrong? https://t.co/IhAXtoch13 https://t.co/…
RT @larrypress: Defunct #satellites will burn up in the atmosphere - what could possibly go wrong? https://t.co/IhAXtoch13 https://t.co/…
RT @larrypress: Defunct #satellites will burn up in the atmosphere - what could possibly go wrong? https://t.co/IhAXtoch13 https://t.co/…
Defunct #satellites will burn up in the atmosphere - what could possibly go wrong? https://t.co/IhAXtoch13 https://t.co/xFeSzoQrl4 "Humans are exceptionally good at underestimating our ability to change the environment." @stevesong @michael_byers @os
"A 5-year cycle would see on average ~2 tonnes re-entering Earth’s atmosphere daily." Debris from reentering megaconstellation satellites could act as "an uncontrolled experiment" affecting the ozone layer or the planet's albedo. 📸NOIRLab DELVE Survey h
RT @OuterSpaceInst: In their most recent article, Aaron Boley and @michael_byers discuss the risks that the unprecedented scale and design…
RT @vrruiz: @acruiz @5im05 @garrett @starlighthastro The skies aren't a private asset. Nobody has asked the international community for per…
RT @acruiz: This is why I draw a parallel between Crypto Currencies and Starlink. They both are an excercise of fucking up the planet for t…
RT @vrruiz: @acruiz @5im05 @garrett @starlighthastro The skies aren't a private asset. Nobody has asked the international community for per…
RT @vrruiz: @acruiz @5im05 @garrett @starlighthastro The skies aren't a private asset. Nobody has asked the international community for per…
This is why I draw a parallel between Crypto Currencies and Starlink. They both are an excercise of fucking up the planet for the sake of superfluous technological awe.
RT @vrruiz: @acruiz @5im05 @garrett @starlighthastro The skies aren't a private asset. Nobody has asked the international community for per…