| Title |
Isotopic evidence for source of diagenetic carbonates formed during burial of organic-rich sediments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 1977
|
| DOI | 10.1038/269209a0 |
| Authors |
Hilary Irwin, Charles Curtis, Max Coleman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 30% |
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 148 | 69% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Energy | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#66,204
of 92,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,209
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#30
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.