| Title |
Visual marking in mammals first proved by manipulations of brown bear tree debarking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-88472-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincenzo Penteriani, Enrique González-Bernardo, Alfonso Hartasánchez, Héctor Ruiz-Villar, Ana Morales-González, Andrés Ordiz, Giulia Bombieri, Juan Diaz García, David Cañedo, Chiara Bettega, María Del Mar Delgado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 40 | 28% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 126 | 88% |
| Scientists | 15 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#308,928
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,551
of 142,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,947
of 456,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#107
of 4,660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.