| Title |
The general fault in our fault lines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Ruggeri, Bojana Većkalov, Lana Bojanić, Thomas L. Andersen, Sarah Ashcroft-Jones, Nélida Ayacaxli, Paula Barea-Arroyo, Mari Louise Berge, Ludvig D. Bjørndal, Aslı Bursalıoğlu, Vanessa Bühler, Martin Čadek, Melis Çetinçelik, Georgia Clay, Anna Cortijos-Bernabeu, Kaja Damnjanović, Tatianna M. Dugue, Maya Esberg, Celia Esteban-Serna, Ezra N. Felder, Maja Friedemann, Darianna I. Frontera-Villanueva, Patricia Gale, Eduardo Garcia-Garzon, Sandra J. Geiger, Leya George, Allegra Girardello, Aleksandra Gracheva, Anastasia Gracheva, Marquis Guillory, Marlene Hecht, Katharina Herte, Barbora Hubená, William Ingalls, Lea Jakob, Margo Janssens, Hannes Jarke, Ondřej Kácha, Kalina Nikolova Kalinova, Ralitsa Karakasheva, Peggah R. Khorrami, Žan Lep, Samuel Lins, Ingvild S. Lofthus, Salomé Mamede, Silvana Mareva, Mafalda F. Mascarenhas, Lucy McGill, Sara Morales-Izquierdo, Bettina Moltrecht, Tasja S. Mueller, Marzia Musetti, Joakim Nelsson, Thiago Otto, Alessandro F. Paul, Irena Pavlović, Marija B. Petrović, Dora Popović, Gerhard M. Prinz, Josip Razum, Ivaylo Sakelariev, Vivian Samuels, Inés Sanguino, Nicolas Say, Jakob Schuck, Irem Soysal, Anna Louise Todsen, Markus R. Tünte, Milica Vdovic, Jáchym Vintr, Maja Vovko, Marek A. Vranka, Lisa Wagner, Lauren Wilkins, Manou Willems, Elizabeth Wisdom, Aleksandra Yosifova, Sandy Zeng, Mahmoud A. Ahmed, Twinkle Dwarkanath, Mina Cikara, Jeffrey Lees, Tomas Folke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 646 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 148 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 6% |
| Spain | 29 | 4% |
| Canada | 16 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 13 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
| Chile | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 97 | 15% |
| Unknown | 272 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 413 | 64% |
| Scientists | 189 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 23% |
| Psychology | 24 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 557. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#43,881
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#105
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,571
of 455,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#6
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 160.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.