The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||50||52%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||24||23%|
|Student > Master||10||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||6||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||25||24%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||14||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 430,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 153.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.