↓ Skip to main content

Rare-earth recycling needs market intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Materials, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Rare-earth recycling needs market intervention
Published in
Nature Reviews Materials, March 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41578-021-00308-w
Authors

Koen Binnemans, Paul McGuiness, Peter Tom Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 8 10%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 12%
Chemical Engineering 7 9%
Materials Science 6 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,145,856
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#347
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,763
of 430,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.