↓ Skip to main content

A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
2 research highlight platforms

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria
Published in
Nature, November 2010
DOI 10.1038/nature09490
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie K. Aoki, Elie J. Diner, Claire t’Kint de Roodenbeke, Brandt R. Burgess, Stephen J. Poole, Bruce A. Braaten, Allison M. Jones, Julia S. Webb, Christopher S. Hayes, Peggy A. Cotter, David A. Low

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 239 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 28%
Researcher 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Master 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 11%
Chemistry 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 24 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,916,034
of 19,870,288 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#39,139
of 84,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,825
of 325,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#726
of 876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,870,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.