| Title |
A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09490 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie K. Aoki, Elie J. Diner, Claire t’Kint de Roodenbeke, Brandt R. Burgess, Stephen J. Poole, Bruce A. Braaten, Allison M. Jones, Julia S. Webb, Christopher S. Hayes, Peggy A. Cotter, David A. Low |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 24% |
| Researcher | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,422,073
of 24,447,003 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#45,213
of 95,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,701
of 188,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#284
of 643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,447,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.