| Title |
A thymus candidate in lampreys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baubak Bajoghli, Peng Guo, Narges Aghaallaei, Masayuki Hirano, Christine Strohmeier, Nathanael McCurley, Dale E. Bockman, Michael Schorpp, Max D. Cooper, Thomas Boehm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 176 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 55% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,797,545
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#60,899
of 91,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,614
of 185,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#444
of 626 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 626 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.