| Title |
Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature07285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ole Seehausen, Yohey Terai, Isabel S. Magalhaes, Karen L. Carleton, Hillary D. J. Mrosso, Ryutaro Miyagi, Inke van der Sluijs, Maria V. Schneider, Martine E. Maan, Hidenori Tachida, Hiroo Imai, Norihiro Okada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | <1% |
| Brazil | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 7 | <1% |
| Japan | 6 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1247 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 303 | 22% |
| Researcher | 248 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 176 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 175 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 79 | 6% |
| Other | 245 | 18% |
| Unknown | 129 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 930 | 69% |
| Environmental Science | 86 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 85 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | <1% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | <1% |
| Other | 66 | 5% |
| Unknown | 164 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#857,540
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,799
of 98,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,788
of 102,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#52
of 556 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 556 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.