The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||51||49%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||34||30%|
|Student > Master||10||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||6%|
|Student > Postgraduate||7||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||4%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,489,824 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
of 52,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 428,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
of 1,706 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,706 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.